|
Featured 2024 Other Outputs Submission to the Senate Select Committee on Adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI)Curtis, Caitlin (2024). Submission to the Senate Select Committee on Adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI). Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland. doi: 10.14264/48dfdd6 |
|
Featured 2023 Other Outputs Trust in AI: Country insights on shifting public perceptions of AI: Country findingsGillespie, Nicole, Lockey, Steve, Curtis, Caitlin and Pool, Javad (2023). Trust in AI: Country insights on shifting public perceptions of AI: Country findings. Brisbane, Australia; New York, United States: The University of Queensland; KPMG Australia. |
|
2023 Other Outputs Regulation is key to responsible AI, but what might this look like?Curtis, Caitlin and Lockey, Steven (2023, 04 05). Regulation is key to responsible AI, but what might this look like? The Australian and New Zealand School of Government / National Regulators Community of Practice Newsletter |
|
2023 Other Outputs Submission to the Australian Government: Attorney-General’s Department review of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) - genetic and genomic dataCurtis, Caitlin, Hereward, James and Newton, Giselle (2023). Submission to the Australian Government: Attorney-General’s Department review of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) - genetic and genomic data. Brisbane, QLD, Australia: The University of Queensland and the Australian Government: Attorney-General’s Department. |
|
2023 Other Outputs A survey of over 17,000 people indicates only half of us are willing to trust AI at workGillespie, Nicole, Curtis, Caitlin, Pool, Javad and Lockey, Steven (2023, 02 23). A survey of over 17,000 people indicates only half of us are willing to trust AI at work The Conversation |
|
2023 Other Outputs Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A global studyGillespie, Nicole, Lockey, Steven, Curtis, Caitlin, Pool, Javad and Ali Akbari (2023). Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A global study. Brisbane, Australia; New York, United States: The University of Queensland; KPMG Australia. doi: 10.14264/00d3c94 |
|
2021 Other Outputs New technology lets police link DNA to appearance and ancestry – and it’s coming to AustraliaCurtis, Caitlin and Hereward, James (2021, 12 13). New technology lets police link DNA to appearance and ancestry – and it’s coming to Australia The Conversation |
|
2021 Other Outputs Trust in artificial Intelligence: a five country studyGillespie, Nicole, Lockey, Steve and Curtis, Caitlin (2021). Trust in artificial Intelligence: a five country study. Brisbane, Australia; New York, United States: The University of Queensland; KPMG. doi: 10.14264/e34bfa3 |
|
Featured 2020 Other Outputs Submission to the Review of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)Curtis, Caitlin, Gillespie, Nicole and Lockey, Steve (2020). Submission to the Review of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth). Australia: The University of Queensland & Australian Government: Attorney-General's Department. doi: 10.14264/501b50f |
|
2020 Other Outputs Achieving Trustworthy AI: A Model for Trustworthy Artificial IntelligenceGillespie, Nicole, Curtis, Caitlin, Bianchi, Rossana, Akbari, Ali and Fentener van Vlissingen, Rita (2020). Achieving Trustworthy AI: A Model for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Australia: The University of Queensland and KPMG. doi: 10.14264/ca0819d |
|
2020 Other Outputs Australians have low trust in artificial intelligence and want it to be better regulatedCurtis, Caitlin, Gillespie, Nicole and Lockey, Steven (2020, 10 29). Australians have low trust in artificial intelligence and want it to be better regulated The Conversation |
|
2020 Other Outputs Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Australian InsightsLockey, Steve, Gillespie, Nicole and Curtis, Caitlin (2020). Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Australian Insights . Australia: The University of Queensland and KPMG. doi: 10.14264/b32f129 |
|
2020 Other Outputs Human rights and technology project, submission #73 to the Australian Human Rights CommissionCurtis, Caitlin, Radke, Amelia and Hereward, James (2020). Human rights and technology project, submission #73 to the Australian Human Rights Commission. Human Rights and Technology Project: Australian Human Rights Commission. |
|
2019 Other Outputs Policy futures: regulating the new economyHussey, Karen, Yarnold, Jennifer, McEwan, Christopher, Maher, Ray, Henman, Paul, Radke, Amelia, Curtis, Caitlin, Fidelman, Pedro, Vickers, Claudia and Brolan, Claire (2019). Policy futures: regulating the new economy. Policy Futures Brisbane, Australia: The University of Queensland. |
|
2019 Other Outputs How DNA ancestry testing can change our ideas of who we areCurtis, Caitlin (2019, 04 01). How DNA ancestry testing can change our ideas of who we are The Conversation |
|
2018 Other Outputs Dramatic advances in forensics expose the need for genetic data legislationCurtis, Caitlin, Hereward, James, Devereux, John, Hussey, Karen and Mangelsdorf, Marie (2018, 12 19). Dramatic advances in forensics expose the need for genetic data legislation The Conversation |
|
2018 Other Outputs Tweaking just a few genes in wild plants can create new food crops - but let's get the regulation rightHereward, James and Curtis, Caitlin (2018, 10 24). Tweaking just a few genes in wild plants can create new food crops - but let's get the regulation right The Conversation |
|
2018 Other Outputs Submission to the Australian Human Rights Commission, Human Rights and Technology ProjectCurtis, Caitlin, Mangelsdorf, Marie and Hereward, James (2018). Submission to the Australian Human Rights Commission, Human Rights and Technology Project. Australia: Australian Human Rights Commission. |
|
2018 Other Outputs Online genealogy has created an unregulated forensic database for policeCurtis, Caitlin (2018, 08 13). Online genealogy has created an unregulated forensic database for police ABC Online |
|
2018 Other Outputs Criminals can’t easily edit their DNA out of forensic databasesCurtis, Caitlin and Hereward, James (2018, 05 11). Criminals can’t easily edit their DNA out of forensic databases The Conversation |
