Overview
Background
Dr. Dani Linder is a Bundjalung, Kungarakany woman from Grafton, New South Wales, a public lawyer, and a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Queensland, Australia (UQ), where she teaches "Foundations of Law" and "Law and Indigenous Peoples". As an Indigenous legal academic, feminist, and advocate for constitutional reform and political empowerment of First Nations, her research interests include Indigenous self-determination and cultural identity, electoral law and policy reform, Indigenous political participation and representation, comparative constitutional law, and international human rights.
Dr. Linder is an admitted lawyer with a Bachelor of Laws degree, a Graduate Diploma in Legal Practice, a Master of Laws degree which specialises in Corporate and Commercial Law and Practice, and a Doctor of Philosophy in Law. Her Ph.D. thesis is titled "The Law and Policy of Indigenous Cultural Identity and Political Participation: A Comparative Analysis between Australia, Canada, and New Zealand". During her Ph.D., Dr. Linder was selected as a 2017 Kathleen Fitzpatrick Laureate visiting Fellow for Comparative Constitutional Law at the University of Melbourne under Professor Adrienne Stone and soon after, became a commentator on issues of First Nations justice in the national media and scholarly publications.
Availability
- Dr Dani Linder is:
- Available for supervision
- Media expert
Fields of research
Qualifications
- Bachelor of Law, Griffith University
- Diploma of Legal Practice, The College of Law
- Masters (Coursework) of Law, Bond University
- Doctor of Philosophy of Law, Bond University
Research interests
-
Indigenous political participation and representation
Dr. Linder welcomes expressions of interest for Research Higher Degree supervision (MPhil or Ph.D.) on a range of topics in Indigenous political participation and representation and recognition. Projects could explore: (i) International and national recognition of Indigenous cultural identity, self-determination, and self-government rights; (ii) Indigenous express and implied constitutional rights that impact Indigenous political participation and representation as expressed and exercised through voting and candidacy; (iii) Indigenous women and the law with a particular focus on Aboriginal women and their experiences with disenfranchisement; (iv) Indigenous citizenship rights, particularly following the Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth High Court Cases,
Research impacts
Since completing her Ph.D. Dr Linder has published in scholarly journals and edited collections, as well as making submissions for law reform in the field of First Nations justice. Dr. Linder has also served in the Senior Uluru Dialogue Leadership that holds the cultural mandate and authority for the Uluru Statement from the Heart for several years, a role that has seen her travel the country and engage with Indigenous communities and community leaders. Dr. Linder is a leading Indigenous legal advocate for enhancing Indigenous political participation and representation within Australian law and policy decision-making processes within Indigenous, legal, and academic communities as well as in the broader media.
Prior to becoming an Indigenous legal academic, Dr. Linder also previously worked as a lawyer in a number of different areas of law for several Commonwealth and State government agencies. This experience, alongside her grassroots upbringing on Bundjalung land and her connection to her Aboriginal community, and cultural identity, influenced her passion, drive, and commitment to advocating for Indigenous social justice issues and human rights. Dr. Linder has authored on complex constitutional law issues, both alone and in collaboration, numerous peer-reviewed articles and book chapters, an expert analysis report of the consultative process of the government’s co-design process for an Indigenous Voice, op-eds published in national print and online media. Dr. Linder has also presented in a number of webinar series that have discussed the importance of establishing a constitutionally enshrined First Nations Voice to Parliament and she is an experienced commentator in the national media on the Uluru Statement and has presented her scholarship as an expert for the United Nations Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, various radio and television news broadcasts, at the Sydney Bar Association, before Federal Indigenous Senators and Members of Parliament, the NSW Crown Solicitors Office, multinational corporations and the Cambridge University Decolonizing Criminology Network.
In 2021, when the Morrison government sought to reform the Commonwealth Electoral Law Act 1918 to add further red tape to voter I.D laws which would disproportionately impact Indigenous voter outcomes, Dr. Linder was a prominent Indigenous legal advocate who supported the rejection of that proposal as evidenced through her activism and commentary in The Conversation, The National Indigenous Times, the Western Australian Newspaper, and the Electoral Regulation Research Network. Dr. Linder has also provided expert advice on Indigenous voting and candidacy representation for the UNSW Indigenous Law Centre and Public Interest Advocacy Centre's "Towards Truth" project which is a world first-of-its-kind interactive information database that maps legislation and policies that have impacted upon First Nations’ lives throughout Australian history to enable truth-telling about our history.
Works
Search Professor Dani Linder’s works on UQ eSpace
2021
Other Outputs
What did the public say about the government’s Indigenous Voice co-design process?
Larkin, Dani , Buxton-Namisnyk, Emma and Appleby, Gabrielle (2021, 07 06). What did the public say about the government’s Indigenous Voice co-design process? The Conversation
2021
Other Outputs
Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process: An Expert Analysis of the NIAA Consultations
Appleby, Gabrielle , Buxton-Namisnyk, Emma and Larkin, Dani (2021). Indigenous Voice Co-Design Process: An Expert Analysis of the NIAA Consultations. Sydney, Australia: Indigenous Law Centre, UNSW.
2021
Book Chapter
Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43
Larkin, Dani and Crowe, Jonathan (2021). Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43. Indigenous legal judgments: bringing Indigenous voices into judicial decision making. (pp. 245-259) edited by Heather Douglas and Nicole Watson. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781003174349
2021
Other Outputs
Representation and good governance: institutional transformation via Voice to Parliament
Galloway, Kate and Larkin, Dani (2021, 06 18). Representation and good governance: institutional transformation via Voice to Parliament Indigenous Constitutional Law Blog
2021
Journal Article
Constitutionally entrenched Voice to Parliament: representation and good governance
Larkin, Dani and Galloway, Kate (2021). Constitutionally entrenched Voice to Parliament: representation and good governance. Alternative Law Journal, 46 (3), 193-198. doi: 10.1177/1037969x211019807
2021
Other Outputs
Constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament fills institutional gap
Galloway, Kate and Larkin, Dani (2021, 04 17). Constitutionally enshrined Voice to Parliament fills institutional gap Griffith Law Futures Centre Blog
2021
Other Outputs
Membership Models for an Indigenous Voice: What does representation mean for First Nations?
Larkin, Dani (2021, 03 11). Membership Models for an Indigenous Voice: What does representation mean for First Nations? Indigenous Constitutional Law Blog
2021
Other Outputs
Voices must be heard so that Constitution becomes inclusive
Larkin, Dani (2021, 02 19). Voices must be heard so that Constitution becomes inclusive National Indigenous Times
2021
Other Outputs
Silencing the Voice: How government is failing the Uluru Statement from the Heart
Larkin, Dani (2021, 01 22). Silencing the Voice: How government is failing the Uluru Statement from the Heart IndigenousX
2020
Other Outputs
The law and policy of Indigenous cultural identity and political participation: a comparative analysis between Australia, Canada and New Zealand
Larkin, Dani (2020). The law and policy of Indigenous cultural identity and political participation: a comparative analysis between Australia, Canada and New Zealand. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Law, Bond University.
2020
Other Outputs
Lidia Thorpe wants to shift course on Indigenous recognition. Here’s why we must respect the Uluru Statement
Larkin, Dani and Maguire, Amy (2020, 07 08). Lidia Thorpe wants to shift course on Indigenous recognition. Here’s why we must respect the Uluru Statement The Conversation
2020
Other Outputs
Think slavery in Australia was all in the past? Think again
McGaughey, Fiona , Maguire, Amy and Larkin, Dani (2020, 06 18). Think slavery in Australia was all in the past? Think again The Canberra Times
2020
Other Outputs
Think slavery in Australia was all in the past? Think again
McGaughey, Fiona , Maguire, Amy and Larkin, Dani (2020, 06 17). Think slavery in Australia was all in the past? Think again The Conversation
2018
Journal Article
Uluru Statement from the Heart: Australian public law pluralism
Larkin, Dani and Galloway, Kate (2018). Uluru Statement from the Heart: Australian public law pluralism. Bond Law Review, 30 (2), 335-245. doi: 10.53300/001c.6796
Supervision
Availability
- Dr Dani Linder is:
- Available for supervision
Before you email them, read our advice on how to contact a supervisor.
Media
Enquiries
Contact Dr Dani Linder directly for media enquiries about their areas of expertise.
Need help?
For help with finding experts, story ideas and media enquiries, contact our Media team: