Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer
 Lee Aitken

Lee Aitken

Email: 

Overview

Background

Lee Aitken is an Associate Professor at the TC Beirne Faculty of Law, The University of Queensland and studied at ANU, Oxford and Columbia. He has previously taught at law schools in Canada, Hong Kong, and Australia as well as practising extensively as a solicitor and barrister. While at the Sydney Bar from 1994 to 2005 he specialized in property, banking, insolvency, and general commercial disputes. He appeared in several leading cases in the High Court of Australia including Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR, Garcia v National Australia Bank (1998) 194 CLR 395, Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi (2003) 217 CLR 315, and Palgo Holdings Pty Ltd v Gowans (2005) 221 CLR 249.

Availability

Lee Aitken is:
Available for supervision

Fields of research

Qualifications

  • Bachelor of Law (Hons), Australian National University
  • Bachelor of Civil Law, Oxf.

Research interests

  • Contract Law

Works

Search Professor Lee Aitken’s works on UQ eSpace

69 works between 1990 and 2017

1 - 20 of 69 works

Featured

2015

Journal Article

Performance Bonds: Risk-allocation, Construction, Fraud, and Overpayment

Aitken, Lee (2015). Performance Bonds: Risk-allocation, Construction, Fraud, and Overpayment. Australian Bar Review, 40, 222-245.

Performance Bonds: Risk-allocation, Construction, Fraud, and Overpayment

Featured

2015

Journal Article

No alsatias: equitable execution, and recent developments in the asset preservation order

Aitken, Lee (2015). No alsatias: equitable execution, and recent developments in the asset preservation order. Australian Bar Review, 40, 52-63.

No alsatias: equitable execution, and recent developments in the asset preservation order

Featured

2015

Journal Article

Thoughts for the litigant in person – some common, but unsuccessful, arguments which should not be raised in resisting the bank's claim

Aitken, Lee (2015). Thoughts for the litigant in person – some common, but unsuccessful, arguments which should not be raised in resisting the bank's claim. Journal of Banking and Finance - Law and Practice, 26 (3), 173-181.

Thoughts for the litigant in person – some common, but unsuccessful, arguments which should not be raised in resisting the bank's claim

Featured

2015

Journal Article

Continuing Contractual Conundrums: 'Repudiating' a Contract, Penalties, Good Faith and the Scope of the Legitimate Interest Principle in White & Carter

Aitken, Lee (2015). Continuing Contractual Conundrums: 'Repudiating' a Contract, Penalties, Good Faith and the Scope of the Legitimate Interest Principle in White & Carter. Australian Bar Review, 40 (2), 112-123.

Continuing Contractual Conundrums: 'Repudiating' a Contract, Penalties, Good Faith and the Scope of the Legitimate Interest Principle in White & Carter

Featured

2014

Book Chapter

Options for the Dunning Creditor Under the Statute of Elizabeth

Aitken, Lee (2014). Options for the Dunning Creditor Under the Statute of Elizabeth. Exploring tensions in finance law : Trans-Tasman insights. (pp. 253-275) edited by Shelley Griffiths, Sheelagh McCracken and Ann Wardrop. Wellington, New Zealand: Thomson Reuters.

Options for the Dunning Creditor Under the Statute of Elizabeth

Featured

2014

Journal Article

Unscrambling 'detriment' - unjust enrichment, mistaken payments, and estoppel

Aitken, Lee (2014). Unscrambling 'detriment' - unjust enrichment, mistaken payments, and estoppel. Australian Bar Review, 38 (3), 269-282.

Unscrambling 'detriment' - unjust enrichment, mistaken payments, and estoppel

2017

Journal Article

A bank's `no set-off clause', the guarantor and the claim for `loss or damage' (or statutory reconfiguring of a contract)

Aitken, Lee (2017). A bank's `no set-off clause', the guarantor and the claim for `loss or damage' (or statutory reconfiguring of a contract). Australian Banking and Finance Law Bulletin, 33 (4), 74-77.

A bank's `no set-off clause', the guarantor and the claim for `loss or damage' (or statutory reconfiguring of a contract)

2017

Journal Article

Counterparties beware! The nature of the `security interest’: set-off, corporate insolvency and the PPSA

Aitken, Lee (2017). Counterparties beware! The nature of the `security interest’: set-off, corporate insolvency and the PPSA. Australian Banking and Finance Law Bulletin, 33 (8), 125-128.

Counterparties beware! The nature of the `security interest’: set-off, corporate insolvency and the PPSA

2017

Journal Article

`Widgets' or `wodgets'? A heterodox reappraisal of the fiduciary who `steals a business': `account', `allowances', "consent' and other perplexing issues

Aitken, Lee (2017). `Widgets' or `wodgets'? A heterodox reappraisal of the fiduciary who `steals a business': `account', `allowances', "consent' and other perplexing issues. Australian Bar Review, 44, 250-266.

`Widgets' or `wodgets'? A heterodox reappraisal of the fiduciary who `steals a business': `account', `allowances', "consent' and other perplexing issues

2016

Journal Article

Interpreting R v Baden-Clay: `discovering the inward intention’, or 'what lies under the veil?'

Aitken, Lee (2016). Interpreting R v Baden-Clay: `discovering the inward intention’, or 'what lies under the veil?'. The University of Queensland Law Journal, 301-311.

Interpreting R v Baden-Clay: `discovering the inward intention’, or 'what lies under the veil?'

2016

Journal Article

'Agency’ mortgage originators and loan enforcement

Aitken, Lee (2016). 'Agency’ mortgage originators and loan enforcement. Australian Bar Review, 41, 220-235.

'Agency’ mortgage originators and loan enforcement

2016

Journal Article

Recovering `stolen money' – Barnes v Addy, money had and received, and the struggle for remedial coherence

Aitken, Lee (2016). Recovering `stolen money' – Barnes v Addy, money had and received, and the struggle for remedial coherence. Australian Bar Review, 43, 304-320.

Recovering `stolen money' – Barnes v Addy, money had and received, and the struggle for remedial coherence

2016

Journal Article

‘Absolute assignment’, and the equitable ‘charge’ — Further developments

Aitken, Lee (2016). ‘Absolute assignment’, and the equitable ‘charge’ — Further developments. Australian Bar Review, 42, 310-323.

‘Absolute assignment’, and the equitable ‘charge’ — Further developments

2016

Journal Article

Exact Compliance and the Letter of Credit

Aitken, Lee (2016). Exact Compliance and the Letter of Credit. Australian Banking and Finance Law Bulletin, 32 (4), 82-84.

Exact Compliance and the Letter of Credit

2016

Journal Article

Banker and Customer - Incorporation of Terms, Ratification and the Validity of Gee's `laws of Litigation'

Aitken, Lee (2016). Banker and Customer - Incorporation of Terms, Ratification and the Validity of Gee's `laws of Litigation'. Australian Banking and Finance Law Bulletin, 32 (9), 182-185.

Banker and Customer - Incorporation of Terms, Ratification and the Validity of Gee's `laws of Litigation'

2015

Journal Article

Modified universalism: confined or confirmed

Aitken, Lee (2015). Modified universalism: confined or confirmed. Australian Bar Review.

Modified universalism: confined or confirmed

2015

Journal Article

Letter of credit, right of suit, and a bill of landing

Aitken, Lee (2015). Letter of credit, right of suit, and a bill of landing. Australian Banking and Finance Law Bulletin, 31 (1), 14-14.

Letter of credit, right of suit, and a bill of landing

2015

Journal Article

The ordinary course of business and the PPSA

Aitken, Lee (2015). The ordinary course of business and the PPSA. Australian Banking and Finance Law Bulletin, 31 (2), 31-35.

The ordinary course of business and the PPSA

2014

Journal Article

Restitution, trust, account, and the autonomous payment obligation

Aitken, Lee (2014). Restitution, trust, account, and the autonomous payment obligation. Law Quarterly Review, 130, 385-387.

Restitution, trust, account, and the autonomous payment obligation

2014

Journal Article

The artisan as lienee and recovery of storage charges in the context of general average

Aitken, Lee (2014). The artisan as lienee and recovery of storage charges in the context of general average. Law Quarterly Review, 130, 177-180.

The artisan as lienee and recovery of storage charges in the context of general average

Supervision

Availability

Lee Aitken is:
Available for supervision

Looking for a supervisor? Read our advice on how to choose a supervisor.

Media

Enquiries

For media enquiries about Lee Aitken's areas of expertise, story ideas and help finding experts, contact our Media team:

communications@uq.edu.au