Skip to menu Skip to content Skip to footer

2010

Journal Article

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia 2010

Barker, Kit (2010). Restitution Regional Digest - Australia 2010. Restitution Law Review, 18, 95-117.

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia 2010

2009

Book Chapter

The nature of responsibility for gain: Gain, harm and keeping the lid on pandora's box

Barker, Kit (2009). The nature of responsibility for gain: Gain, harm and keeping the lid on pandora's box. The Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment. (pp. 146-180) edited by R. Chambers, C. Mitchell and J. Penner. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567751.003.0006

The nature of responsibility for gain: Gain, harm and keeping the lid on pandora's box

2009

Journal Article

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia

Barker, Kit (2009). Restitution Regional Digest - Australia. Restitution Law Review, 17, 147-173.

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia

2009

Journal Article

Review of The law of rescission

Barker, Kit (2009). Review of The law of rescission. Law Quarterly Review, 125, 175-177.

Review of The law of rescission

2008

Book

Unjust enrichment

Barker, Kit and Grantham, Ross (2008). Unjust enrichment. Sydney, NSW, Australia: LexisNexis Butterworths.

Unjust enrichment

2008

Journal Article

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia 2008

Barker, Kit (2008). Restitution Regional Digest - Australia 2008. Restitution Law Review, 16 (1), 141-160.

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia 2008

2008

Book Chapter

Responsibility for gain: Unjust factors or absence of legal ground? Starting points in unjust enrichment law

Barker, K. (2008). Responsibility for gain: Unjust factors or absence of legal ground? Starting points in unjust enrichment law. Structure and justification in private law : Essays for Peter Birks. (pp. 47-74) edited by Charles Rickett and Ross Grantham. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.

Responsibility for gain: Unjust factors or absence of legal ground? Starting points in unjust enrichment law

2008

Book Chapter

Economic loss and the duty of care: A study in the exercise of legal justification

Barker, Kit (2008). Economic loss and the duty of care: A study in the exercise of legal justification. Justifying private law remedies. (pp. 173-201) edited by C. Rickett. Oxford, United Kingdom: Hart Publishing.

Economic loss and the duty of care: A study in the exercise of legal justification

2007

Journal Article

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia

Barker, Kit (2007). Restitution Regional Digest - Australia. Restitution Law Review, 15, 150-170.

Restitution Regional Digest - Australia

2007

Journal Article

Equity in Commerical Law by Simone Degeling and James Edelman (eds)

Barker, Kit (2007). Equity in Commerical Law by Simone Degeling and James Edelman (eds). The Modern Law Review, 70 (1), 163-167. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00631_1.x

Equity in Commerical Law by Simone Degeling and James Edelman (eds)

2006

Journal Article

Wielding Occam’s razor: Pruning strategies for economic loss

Barker, Kit (2006). Wielding Occam’s razor: Pruning strategies for economic loss. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (2), 289-302. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gql004

Wielding Occam’s razor: Pruning strategies for economic loss

2006

Journal Article

Theorising unjust enrichment : Being realist(ic)?

Barker, C D (2006). Theorising unjust enrichment : Being realist(ic)?. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (3), 609-626. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gql021

Theorising unjust enrichment : Being realist(ic)?

2005

Journal Article

Unfamiliar waters: Negligent advocates, egregious errors and lost chances of acquittal

Barker, Kit (2005). Unfamiliar waters: Negligent advocates, egregious errors and lost chances of acquittal. University of Queensland Law Journal, 24 (2), 467-477.

Unfamiliar waters: Negligent advocates, egregious errors and lost chances of acquittal

2004

Journal Article

Review of S. Degeling, Restitutionary Rights to Share in Damages (Cambridge, 2003)

Barker, Kit (2004). Review of S. Degeling, Restitutionary Rights to Share in Damages (Cambridge, 2003). Law Quarterly Review, 120, 351-354.

Review of S. Degeling, Restitutionary Rights to Share in Damages (Cambridge, 2003)

2004

Journal Article

The new Birksian approach to unjust enrichment

Burrows, A., Barker, K. and Swadling, W. (2004). The new Birksian approach to unjust enrichment. Restitution Law Review, 12, 260-265.

The new Birksian approach to unjust enrichment

2004

Book Chapter

Understanding the Unjust Enrichment Principle in Private Law: A Study of the Concept and Its Reasons

Barker, Christopher Douglas (2004). Understanding the Unjust Enrichment Principle in Private Law: A Study of the Concept and Its Reasons. Understanding Unjust Enrichment. (pp. 79-110) edited by Jason W. Neyers, Mitchell McInnes and Stephen G.A. Pitel. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Understanding the Unjust Enrichment Principle in Private Law: A Study of the Concept and Its Reasons

2003

Journal Article

Coping with failure: Re-appraising pre-contractual remuneration

Barker, K. (2003). Coping with failure: Re-appraising pre-contractual remuneration. Journal of Contract Law, 19 (2), 105-133.

Coping with failure: Re-appraising pre-contractual remuneration

2001

Journal Article

Riddles, remedies and restitution: quantifying gain in unjust enrichment law

Barker, Kit (2001). Riddles, remedies and restitution: quantifying gain in unjust enrichment law. Current Legal Problems, 54 (1), 255-305. doi: 10.1093/clp/54.1.255

Riddles, remedies and restitution: quantifying gain in unjust enrichment law

2001

Journal Article

Review of P. Jaffey, The Nature and Scope of the Law of Restitution

Barker, Kit (2001). Review of P. Jaffey, The Nature and Scope of the Law of Restitution. Restitution Law Review, 232-239.

Review of P. Jaffey, The Nature and Scope of the Law of Restitution

2000

Book Chapter

Unjust Enrichment

Kit Barker and L. Smith (2000). Unjust Enrichment. Law's Futures. (pp. 411-432) edited by Hayton. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Unjust Enrichment